<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Lost Book of Nostradamus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://physics309.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-lost-book-of-nostradamus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://physics309.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-lost-book-of-nostradamus/</link>
	<description>Lately it occurs to me/What a long, strange trip its been - Grateful Dead</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:32:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://physics309.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-lost-book-of-nostradamus/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physics309.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-lost-book-of-nostradamus/#comment-241</guid>
		<description>oops, and i could have proofed what i wrote ... drawying is clearly the medieval spelling of drawing.  pardon my antiquarian ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, and i could have proofed what i wrote &#8230; drawying is clearly the medieval spelling of drawing.  pardon my antiquarian ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://physics309.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-lost-book-of-nostradamus/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://physics309.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/the-lost-book-of-nostradamus/#comment-240</guid>
		<description>Hey! I watched that same show (my ... ahem ... 14 year old DVR&#039;d it) and had the same reaction.  Even the teenager was giggling along with me at how inane it was.  The explanations they gave made absolutely no sense (as you clearly point out above), but the Tower drawying was the worst.  So, because N &quot;drew&quot; a tower and because a Tower is the worst card in a tarot deck, the WTC falling is going to be a really bad thing?  Ummm ... I don&#039;t get it.  

Yet, people ... yes, people! ... watch this stuff and some of those people actually buy into it.  Reminds me of a book ... Foucalt&#039;s Pendulum by Umberto Eco, in which the protagonist could make numbers signify anything.  That reminds me of another book, a stupid one at that, The DaVinci Code, in which the author can make a lot of people buy and read anything.  

It is truly an amazing world ... one even Nostradamus couldn&#039;t have predicted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey! I watched that same show (my &#8230; ahem &#8230; 14 year old DVR&#8217;d it) and had the same reaction.  Even the teenager was giggling along with me at how inane it was.  The explanations they gave made absolutely no sense (as you clearly point out above), but the Tower drawying was the worst.  So, because N &#8220;drew&#8221; a tower and because a Tower is the worst card in a tarot deck, the WTC falling is going to be a really bad thing?  Ummm &#8230; I don&#8217;t get it.  </p>
<p>Yet, people &#8230; yes, people! &#8230; watch this stuff and some of those people actually buy into it.  Reminds me of a book &#8230; Foucalt&#8217;s Pendulum by Umberto Eco, in which the protagonist could make numbers signify anything.  That reminds me of another book, a stupid one at that, The DaVinci Code, in which the author can make a lot of people buy and read anything.  </p>
<p>It is truly an amazing world &#8230; one even Nostradamus couldn&#8217;t have predicted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
